HireSprint gives you a verified, ATS-scored talent pool with AI matching — at a fraction of LinkedIn Recruiter's cost, with candidates who actually respond.
18–25%
LinkedIn InMail response rate
Industry average
~65%
HireSprint outreach response
Active opted-in network
£170+
LinkedIn Recruiter monthly cost
Per seat
£79
HireSprint Pro monthly cost
5 seats included
| Feature | HireSprint | LinkedIn Recruiter |
|---|---|---|
| ATS score visible before contact | ✅ Shown upfront | ❌ Not available |
| Identity & CV verification | ✅ All profiles | ❌ Self-reported only |
| Monthly cost (per seat) | £29–£199/mo | £170–£825/mo |
| Candidate response rate | ~65% (interested candidates) | 18–25% (cold outreach) |
| No fake or AI-generated CVs | ✅ Verified at intake | ❌ No CV verification |
| Direct search without posting | ✅ Standard | ✅ Standard |
| AI daily match recommendations | ✅ All paid plans | ❌ Not available |
| Free tier | ✅ Up to 3 matches/month | ❌ Paid only |
| Designed for active job seekers | ✅ Opt-in talent network | ⚠️ Mix of passive/disengaged |
LinkedIn Recruiter (1 seat)
Plus time cost of cold InMail outreach at 18–25% response rate
£170
monthly
£2,040
annual
£1,400–£2,800
per hire est.
LinkedIn Recruiter (team of 3)
Enterprise licence sold separately
£510
monthly
£6,120
annual
£3,000+
per hire est.
HireSprint Pro (5 seats)
Includes AI matching, verified pool, AI Job Launcher
£79
monthly
£948
annual
£200–£500
per hire est.
HireSprint Scale (unlimited)
Unlimited candidate unlocks + unlimited AI matches
£199
monthly
£2,388
annual
£100–£300
per hire est.
Use LinkedIn Recruiter when…
Use HireSprint when…
Can I use HireSprint instead of LinkedIn Recruiter, or do I need both?
Most hiring teams start by using HireSprint for roles where CV quality and ATS matching are primary filters, while keeping LinkedIn for executive search and relationship-building. After a few successful placements via HireSprint, many reduce LinkedIn Recruiter to a single seat or cancel entirely for non-executive roles.
Why are HireSprint's response rates so much higher than LinkedIn InMail?
Candidates on HireSprint are active — they've opted into the talent network specifically to be discovered by employers. They're not being cold-contacted. When you message a candidate you've unlocked, they already know a verified employer is reaching out. That context produces significantly higher engagement than an InMail to a passive LinkedIn user.
Does HireSprint have the same candidate volume as LinkedIn?
No. LinkedIn has 900 million profiles. HireSprint has a curated, verified network of 4,000+ candidates. Volume is not the goal — quality is. If you're looking for a specific profile, HireSprint's ATS score filter means every search result is a pre-qualified, genuinely relevant candidate. You're not filtering through 5,000 profiles to find 10 good ones.
What if I can't find the candidate I need on HireSprint?
The talent network grows weekly as more job seekers join and verify their profiles. For very specialist or niche roles, we'd suggest using HireSprint for AI-matched candidates while running parallel searches elsewhere. For most mid-level and generalist roles, the network is deep enough to shortlist from.
How long does it take to get a shortlist from HireSprint?
For a typical mid-level role, an employer using the search + AI matching combination gets a working shortlist within 24–48 hours. Compared to the typical 5–7 day time-to-shortlist for manual LinkedIn sourcing, this is a significant efficiency gain — especially for teams running multiple live roles simultaneously.
Free account. No credit card. Compare your first AI-matched candidates before committing to anything.
Start free — no credit card →Follow HireSprint for daily job hacks & AI career tools